How will I feel when people no longer ask me what I think?

Question submitted by S. Stolz, St. Petersburg, FL.

Probably worse than you expect, and for a reason worth naming. Being looked to for what you know is a specific thing — researchers call it reliance — and it was the part your job was supplying. It goes when the job goes. But your industry moving on is not the same as your judgment expiring.

Let’s start by agreeing with you, because they really did stop asking, and that isn’t in your head or a failure of nerve.

What you know has a shelf life. The problems move on, the names change, and the people still in the room start asking each other instead. None of that is a judgment anyone made about you. It’s what happens once you’re not in the room, and it would have happened to whoever held your chair.

So this page isn’t going to tell you that your opinion still matters to your industry, because you can see perfectly well that it doesn’t. It’s going to tell you something more useful: you have folded two different losses into one, and only one of them actually happened.

What you lost has a name

There’s a word for what you’re describing, and researchers have spent forty years measuring it. They call it mattering — the sense that you make a difference to the people around you. When they tested the idea properly, they found it isn’t one thing at all, but three.

One part of three

Mattering splits three ways: whether people are aware of you, whether people are invested in you, and whether people rely on you — look to you for what you know. They come apart. You can have the first two in full and have lost the third completely.
Elliott, Kao & Grant, Self and Identity (2004)

That third one has a name too. Reliance.

And that is exactly what you’ve lost. It isn’t the sense that people care about you, and it isn’t the sense that anyone would notice if you disappeared. What went is narrower than both: being the person somebody comes to because you’ll know.

Being precise about that matters, because the three parts get treated as one thing in almost every conversation you’re likely to have about this. When you tell someone you feel like you don’t matter anymore, they hear all three at once, so they reassure you about the two you haven’t lost.

Company isn’t the same as being asked

Here’s what may be the most useful thing on this page.

When researchers built the measure for mattering, they tested it against everything it might secretly turn out to be, including self-esteem and the plain amount of social support a person has. It came apart from all of them. Feeling that people rely on you is measurably not the same as having people around you.

Be careful with that, though, because the two do travel together. People who feel they don’t matter are often lonely as well, and researchers who study both find them tangled up in each other. This page isn’t claiming you’re fine as long as the calendar is full.

What it is claiming is narrower. You can have a good marriage, a full calendar and friends you genuinely like, and still be describing something real and specific when you say nobody asks what you think. The people telling you to get out more aren’t wrong about getting out more — they’re answering a different question.

Why this one went first

Now the part worth sitting with, which is where each of the three parts actually comes from.

Being noticed and being invested in come from people who are still in your life: your spouse, your children, old friends. Those relationships don’t end when the job does, and some of them get better.

Being relied on for what you know was almost entirely your job’s doing. It came from being the person in the room who had seen it before, and from thirty years of people learning that you were worth asking. When the room went, the whole supply went with it — not slowly, and not because anybody sat down and reassessed you.

Research on older adults points the same way. When people were asked how much others relied on them, the formal roles — a job, a volunteer post — explained more than the informal ones. Being someone’s parent or grandparent or neighbour mattered less to that feeling than holding a position did. Which is worth knowing if you assumed family would fill the gap. On this particular thing, the evidence says it mostly doesn’t.

Your industry moving on and your judgment expiring are two different things. Only one of them happened.

They feel like one thing because they arrived on the same day.

You may still see them. They just don’t ask.

One more thing worth naming, because it’s what makes this so hard to put your finger on.

You might still be invited: still on the group chat, still at the lunches, still hearing from people you liked. None of that is the thing that ended.

The asking stops long before the contact does.

If you want the other half of this, it’s on where all your friends went after you retired — what happens to the contact itself, and how long it takes. This page is about something narrower. Not how often you see people, but what they want from you when you do.

What nobody has actually measured

It’s worth being straight about where the research runs out, because it runs out close to where you’re standing.

The studies that exist do ask people how much others rely on them. But they ask about family and friends: whether someone comes to you when they’re low, whether people tell you things they don’t tell anyone else. That’s real, and it isn’t what you’re describing. You’re describing being asked for your professional judgment by people who do what you used to do, and nobody has measured that properly yet.

When researchers went looking at the programmes built to give retirees new roles, they found something that ought to be uncomfortable for anyone in this business.

Eleven studies

Researchers screened more than nine thousand published papers to find programmes that gave retirees a new role and measured what happened. Eleven were solid enough to use. And across those, the studies rarely recorded whether the role meant anything to the person in it.
Heaven et al., The Milbank Quarterly (2013)

Read that again, because it’s your complaint exactly. The research mostly checked whether people had been handed something to do, and much less often asked whether being handed it made them feel needed.

You are not short of things to do. You’re short of being needed for what you know, and those two have been treated as the same problem for a very long time.

So what’s the actual question?

Being noticed and being invested in come back on their own, because the people who love you keep noticing you without anyone having to plan it.

Reliance doesn’t work that way. Being looked to for what you know only happens where what you know is scarce. And after a career, there is exactly one place where it isn’t scarce: the industry that spent thirty years absorbing everything you had. Of course they stopped asking. They already know.

That isn’t a rebuke, it’s a relocation problem — which means the question worth asking isn’t the one most people reach for.

The question isn’t “how do I stay relevant?” It’s “where is what I know still rare?”

That’s a real question, and it has a different answer for everybody. It depends on what you spent thirty years learning, and on who never got the chance to learn it. Nobody can hand you that answer on a web page, and you should be suspicious of anyone who offers to.

But it’s a better question than the one you’ve been carrying — and unlike that one, it has an answer.

Sources cited on this page (4)
  • Elliott, Kao & Grant, Self and Identity (2004)The paper that established mattering’s three parts — awareness, importance and reliance — and showed it measures something distinct from self-esteem and from the amount of social support a person has. The full text is paywalled; the freely visible abstract carries both claims used here.
  • Fazio, doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland (2007)Over 1,100 adults aged 65 and older in the Washington DC area. Formal roles such as work explained more of how relied-upon people felt than informal ties did. A single survey wave, so it compares people rather than following them.
  • Heaven et al., The Milbank Quarterly (2013)9,062 papers screened, eleven usable studies, seven programmes. The authors note the studies rarely reported the quality or meaning of the roles provided.
  • Froidevaux, Hirschi & Wang, Journal of Vocational Behavior (2016)Two Swiss studies a year apart, of older workers and of retirees. Cited for establishing that mattering carries some of the link between social support and how retirement goes; its results were mixed, and it could not track change across retirement itself.
Email this page

Related questions

A Fulfilling Retirement Takes More Than a Financial Plan

Planning ahead or already retired? Either way, start here. Fifty questions, about fifteen minutes, all five dimensions — and a personalized report showing exactly where you stand.